Review for Exam #2

Hi, everyone!  Exam #2 is scheduled for Wednesday, April 2, in our regular classroom, during our regular class time.  You’ll have 75 minutes to complete the exam, though you probably won’t need that.  All you need to bring to the exam is a writing utensil (preferably a pen).  To prepare for the exam, you should make use of the readings, lectures, class discussions, and the blog (including your colleagues’ comments).  If you want to ask me questions, there are three ways to do it:

1.        Email me at the address on the syllabus (berchnorto@msn.com).  I will respond emailed questions until 1 pm on the day of the exam.

2.       You may post a question in the comments section of this blog post (this has been very effective in other classes).  I will answer any questions posted on the blog before 11 am on the day of the exam (technical reasons for the earlier deadline).  I urge you to take a look at the comments on Wednesday before the exam, so you can take advantage of the questions asked by your colleagues.

3.       I will have office hours on the day of the exam(as well as on Monday, March 31) from 1:45 to 3:20.

The format of the exam is simple.  There will be three essay questions chosen from the list below.  You will be required to answer two of those questions.  Given that you have the questions ahead of time, I will expect high-quality answers that make use of the readings, lectures, discussions, and blog assignments where appropriate. 

1.        Many believe that the 2010 Citizens United decision has dramatically changed the landscape of campaigns and elections.  Describe the major provisions in that decision, as well as its impact on court cases that followed it.  Using evidence and reasoning from the Interest Groups Unleashed book, our lectures and class discussions, and any other information you wish, assess the impact of the decision on campaigns and elections.  Be as specific as possible.

2.       There is little doubt that interest groups in the US are strong and growing stronger.  Some say this is good for democracy; others say it is bad.  What are the major arguments on each side?  Who is right, and why?  Be as specific as possible.

3.       Some argue that shifting to a parliamentary system (specifically, a Westminster system like that in England or Canada) would curb the power of interest groups in the United States.  Others say it will not have much of an impact (or will even increase interest group power).  Taking into account the readings, lectures, discussions, and especially the blog assignment on this topic, what are the major arguments on each side?  Who is right, and why?  Be as specific as possible.

4.       While a great deal of attention has been focused on the role of interest groups in elections, some say that their lobbying efforts are at least as important (and don’t receive enough attention).  Making particular use of chapters 10-15 of the Cigler and Loomis book, what are some major recent developments in lobbying?  In your view, is lobbying as important as the electoral activities of interest groups?  Explain, using reasons and evidence.

Would a Parliamentary System Curb Interest Group Power?

Some say that the reason interest groups are so powerful in the US is due to the system of checks and balances (as well as the two party system).  So, they claim, in order to reduce the power of interest groups, we need to switch to a parliamentary system (perhaps with proportional representation).  Others claim that interest groups would be just as powerful in such a system.  You need to answer three questions:
1.  Would a shift to a parliamentary system reduce the power of interest groups?
2.  Would that only happen if it were accompanied by a shift to proportional representation?
3.  In light of that, as well as your view of the current role of interest groups, would such a shift be a good or bad thing?  Explain.

You should consider the things we've talked about in class, as well as the readings where relevant, but you should also head out into the vastness of the Internet and consider the wide array of arguments that people have made on these questions.  Value academic sources over journalistic sources, but value both over random ramblings of someone with a laptop.  Again, feel free to engage in spirited but civil debate with your colleagues.

Blog assignments are due by 7 am on Wednesday, March 26, and they are worth 25 points.  Good luck!--NB

Paper Assignment

POLS 317

N BERCH

SPRING 2014

 

Paper Assignment

 

You are to write a paper of 7-10 (typed and double-spaced) pages, addressing one of the following questions.  The paper is due in class on Monday, April 21.  Late papers will be penalized 10 points per day.  You should make use of the course readings, lectures, discussions, and blog assignments, where appropriate, and you should do some additional reading as well.  When you cite the words or ideas of those other than yourself, you should cite them in an appropriate fashion.  Please ask if you have questions along the way.  Good luck!

 

1.        In The Logic of Collective Action, Mancur Olson claims that many interests will not form an interest group due to the free rider problem.  He also discusses possible solutions to the free rider problem.  Summarize Olson’s theory.  In the real world, when is he right, and when is he wrong?  Be as specific as possible.

2.       In The Rise and Decline of Nations, Mancur Olson argues that interest groups accrue over time, make demands on government, and eventually slow the rate of economic growth.  Summarize his theory.  Is his theory correct?  Explain.

3.       "Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections."—Barack Obama, State of the Union Address, 2010.  Is he right?  Why or why not?

4.       Are interest groups, on balance, good for democracy or bad for democracy?  Consider both sides and defend a position with reasons and evidence.

5.       Some argue that the only way to curb interest group influence in American politics is to shift to a parliamentary system, reducing the importance of checks and balances and, in turn strengthening political parties.  Evaluate that claim, and the pros and cons of such a shift, using reasons and evidence.